Investigation of environmentally friendly new generation refrigerant R471A instead of R404A in low and medium temperature commercial refrigeration system


Yıldırım R., ŞENCAN ŞAHİN A.

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, cilt.149, sa.12, ss.6307-6317, 2024 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 149 Sayı: 12
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s10973-024-13086-8
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.6307-6317
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Alternative refrigerants, Commercial refrigeration systems, Environmental impact index, Global warming, R471A
  • Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants (such as R134a and R404A), which are widely used in commercial refrigeration systems, contribute greatly to global warming. Because the global warming potential (GWP) values of HFC refrigerants are high. With increasing concerns about the environment (global warming, climate change, etc.) various legal regulations have been made to limit or phase out the use of refrigerants with high GWP values. To use the R471A refrigerant developed by Honeywell in 2022 as an environmentally friendly new-generation refrigerant in the commercial refrigeration system, the performance of the R471A refrigerant should be comprehensively evaluated. In this study, energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of using R471A refrigerant instead of R404A in low and medium-temperature commercial refrigeration systems were carried out and presented. Evaporator temperatures of − 30 °C, − 25 °C, − 20 °C, − 15 °C and − 10 °C and condenser temperatures of 30 °C, 40 °C, and 50 °C were selected to represent low and medium cooling temperatures and hot and cold country seasons. It was seen that R471A presents a lower mass flow rate (between 67 and 71%) and cooling capacity (between 61 and 68%) than R404A however has higher COP (between 6% and 14%) and R404A has exergy efficiency value of 6–14% lower than R471A. Also, from an environmental point of view, R471A has better environmental results than R404A.