Prediction of path loss in coastal and vegetative environments with deep learning at 5G sub-6 GHz


KAYAALP K., Metlek S., GENÇ A., Dogan H., BAŞYİĞİT İ. B.

Wireless Networks, vol.29, no.6, pp.2471-2480, 2023 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 29 Issue: 6
  • Publication Date: 2023
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s11276-023-03285-w
  • Journal Name: Wireless Networks
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, ABI/INFORM, Aerospace Database, Applied Science & Technology Source, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, INSPEC, Metadex, zbMATH, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.2471-2480
  • Keywords: 5G, Coastal terrains, Deep learning, LSTM, Path loss, RNN, Vegetative environments
  • Isparta University of Applied Sciences Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Path loss prediction is quite important for the network performance of the wireless sensors, quality of cellular communication-based link budget, and optimization of coverage planning in mobile networks. With the development of 5G technology, even though different log-distance path loss models are generated for these, new-developed methods are required to make models more flexible and accurate for complex environments. In this study, for different coastal terrains (air-dry sand, wet sand, small pebble, big pebble) and various vegetable areas (pine, orange, cherry, and walnut), the principle and procedure of deep learning-based path loss prediction are provided in 3.5 GHz, 3.8 GHz, and 4.2 GHz in the 5G frequency zone, as a novelty. For this, recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) methods are proposed. The test sample number is 240 since 20% of all datasets (1200) are test data. In general, path loss for coastal terrains is higher than path loss for vegetation areas with an average of 5 dB. For both coastal terrains and vegetation areas, the recurrent neural network method predicts better than the long short-term memory method. Consequently, for both coastal terrains and vegetation areas, RNN models with R2 values of 0.9677 and 0.9042, respectively, are preferred.